Water works

Please get the 55’s and the 75’s in the right places.

How can the West Fernie Waterworks District (WFWD) trustees that were appointed by an order in the Provincial Cabinet explain the position they have taken with respect to the taxes and fees they have said will be charged to West Fernie residents, and other tax payers, if those residents agree to the proposed installation of water, sewer and road infrastructure that will serve a far higher population density or, should the residents not agree to the proposal, how will they explain their right to extra charges for the operating cost of maintaining the West Fernie water system in a condition capable of meeting the needs of the present population, when a legal agreement between the City of Fernie and WFWD residents has fixed that cost at the same amount charged to City residents?

That explanation should involve some pretty fancy dancing for a number of reasons. For a start, the City’s authority cannot extend beyond its boundaries except through a legally binding agreement with the community they have extended the service to. And if the agreement is to be re-negotiated all parties are entitled to have competent knowledgeable representation; providing you’re in a democratic country. Since the elected representatives of the WFWD residents are both aligned with the City, the residents are on their own as far as the three branches of government and representation is concerned. However, the Trustees have quoted the 1955 Agreement that deals with the provision of water only at a minimal fee but the City has billed the WFWD residents according to the 1975 Agreement for 37 years. That is a much higher rate than set in the 1955 agreement, so which is it? Is the City only responsible for water supply and has charged the West Fernie residents well over a million dollars more than the 1922 Agreement allows, or have they legally charged them according to the 1975 Agreement and are responsible for all operating costs of the system as per the 1975 Agreement? Since there is both tacit and written evidence that the 1975 Agreement replaced the need for the WFWD to establish a renewal fund under section 751 of the Local Government Act and that gives substance to the 1975 Agreement and whereas overcharging in spite of the provisions of the 1955 Agreement might be considered fraudulent, it seems the trustees have something of a “Hobson’s Choice.” The designed capacity of the WFWD system was 160 homes.

Has anyone revealed the proposed capacity of the water system or sewer to be installed?

Has anyone noticed that by cleverly giving the RDEK responsibility for the WFWD the three forms of government are evading the boundaries to the City’s authority?

Please get the 55’s and the 75’s in the right places.


Peter Ross

Creston, BC

Just Posted

Sushi, sake and silk kimono

“The Kimono of Ichimaru” opening night at Fernie Museum attracts sellout crowd

Mexico-bound Tour Divide riders complete first day, pass through Fernie

Divide riders looking strong as they finish first leg of 4160 km race

Convicted B.C. child abductor Randall Hopley back in custody, 6 months since release

Correctional Services Canada could not provide further details due to privacy concerns

New society to spearhead ramp building project in Fernie

Gracie Lou Foundation launches to make Fernie more inclusive; ramp building event slated for June 22

GALLERY: Week-long Coal Miner Days a huge success

Skate jam set to become a permanent fixture of Coal Miner Days; other events well attended

10 facts about Father’s Day

Did you know that the special day for dads was first celebrated in 1910?

Elk Valley Bulls RFC reclaim Kootenay Cup

Elk Valley beats Cranbrook 7-5 to win Kootenay Cup; team off to provincials in September

You might not know these B.C. records are public

Hired a lawyer to file a civil claim? Those are published online

B.C. bus driver loses case to get job back after texting while driving full bus

An arbitator ruled that Tim Wesman’s phone usage was a “a reckless disregard for public safety”

Revamped B.C. Lions set to battle veteran Winnipeg Blue Bombers

The Lions’ first test of the season will be a big one

No business case for Trans Mountain expansion, says former environment minister

Cabinet is expected to announce its decision on the expansion of the Alberta-to-B.C. pipeline by Tuesday

LETTER: British Columbia’s forest industry crisis being made worse

Andrew Wilkinson warns of regulatory overload by John Horgan’s NDP

Bears have killed 17 people in B.C. since 1986

Number of bear complaints and bears killed rose sharply during same period

Three Albertans land ‘monster’ sturgeon in B.C.’s Fraser River

For angler who landed the exceptionally large sturgeon it was an ‘incredible dream come true’

Most Read